Partner at Charbonnet Law Firm LLC

Practice Areas: Car Accident, Slip & Fall Accidents

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology forges ahead in the automotive sector, it reshapes not only the way vehicles operate but also the intricacies of legal frameworks that govern these advancements. The intersection of AI and automobiles introduces a new era of transportation, promising enhanced efficiency and safety. However, with these advancements come challenges, particularly in understanding and navigating the legal ramifications of AI car accidents. Understanding the current regulatory landscape is vital for stakeholders, including manufacturers, drivers, and policymakers, to ensure compliance and protect public safety.

Liability in AI-related car accidents presents a complex puzzle. Traditional notions of fault and responsibility become blurred when algorithms make decisions. Identifying who is to blame or hold liable in the event of an AI car accident involves navigating through a maze of legal, ethical, and technical considerations. 

The role of legal counsel cannot be overstated in the context of AI-related accidents. Legal professionals specializing in this field offer invaluable guidance, helping navigate the complexities of claims and litigation.

  • Stricter regulations are emerging for AI in autonomous vehicles.
  • Concerns about safety and AI’s impact on society drive regulatory efforts.
  • Understanding the five tiers of autonomous capability is essential.
  • Federal and state laws in the US are addressing autonomous car safety.
  • Determining liability in AI accidents is complex due to multiple parties involved.
  • Seeking legal advice for AI-related accidents is crucial to navigate this evolving landscape.
Aspect Importance
Stricter AI Regulations Impact on autonomous vehicle development
Safety Concerns and Regulations Addressing accidents and safety concerns
Autonomous Capability Tiers Understanding different levels of autonomy
Federal and State Laws Regulatory framework in the US
Liability in AI Accidents Complex issues involving multiple parties
Importance of Legal Counsel Navigating the intricate legal landscape

Why are autonomous vehicle systems being regulated?

Regulations are in place due to safety concerns and autonomous vehicle incidents. Understanding the five tiers of autonomous capability is crucial in this context.


Who should be held liable for AI accidents?

Liability in AI accidents is complex, involving various parties. Determining accountability is a challenge, making legal counsel essential.

Why Do AI Cars Matter?

Several planned and ongoing laws center on integrating machine vision, sophisticated automation, and other disciplines of artificial intelligence in autonomous cars.

However, more stringent regulations can provide some difficulties for the developing autonomous vehicle sector. 

With these systems expected to generate between $300 and $400 billion in income by 2035, there is still a huge opportunity. 

The lesson that many AI applications are learning—that thorough auditing and governance go beyond risk minimization—may be learned by those developing autonomous driving systems. Reliable AI-supporting systems also promote more efficacy and better results.

There are several things about autonomous vehicle regulation in 2024 that are important to monitor, whether from risk management or an opportunity to increase system efficacy standpoint. 

Bills have been submitted in many of the US’s biggest states. When combined, they will probably have an impact on the national rollout of autonomous vehicle systems.

Concerns about how artificial intelligence (AI) and humans can coexist are becoming more widespread among governments. Governments are becoming more involved in policy and regulation as a result of the problems that these systems may and have caused to the environment, society, and individuals. Barriers are being developed at a rapid pace.

Creating legal solutions to AI-driven accidents and damages, which are becoming more common, is a part of this study. According to a federal organization in the US, there were around 400 auto accidents using self-driving vehicles in 2021 alone. Nonetheless, enforcing existing legal rules is challenging due to the complexity and ambiguity of AI.

Why Regulate Autonomous Vehicle Systems? 

Autonomous vehicles hold the promise of revolutionizing transportation, logistics, and even urban planning. Yet, as these vehicles edge closer to widespread adoption, challenges related to customer trust and safety persist. The potential of autonomous cars to enhance efficiency and reduce human error is counterbalanced by concerns arising from real-world incidents. Notably, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) documented six fatalities linked to autonomous vehicle accidents between July 2021 and May 2022. In a distressing incident in San Francisco, a self-driving taxi obstructed an ambulance, leading to the death of a patient. These incidents have spotlighted the urgent need for rigorous oversight and understanding of autonomous technology.

Why Regulate Autonomous Vehicle Systems? 

In response to these safety concerns, several commissions have been established to examine and regulate autonomous vehicles thoroughly. These efforts are underpinned by the NHTSA’s establishment of five tiers of autonomous capability, ranging from Level 0 (Momentary Driver Assistance) to Level 5 (Full Automation). These levels serve as a foundation for understanding the capabilities and limitations of autonomous vehicles, guiding the development of regulations and best practices.

Five tiers of autonomous capability have been established by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHSTA). 

Over the years, the NHTSA has published guidelines that provide technical support and outline best practices for autonomous driving systems. These guidelines aim to foster innovation while ensuring that safety remains paramount. Additionally, lawmakers in the United States are addressing safety concerns related to self-driving vehicles by introducing legislation. This legislative effort seeks to codify safety regulations and best practices into law, creating a legal framework that supports the safe development and deployment of autonomous vehicles.

At the state level, there is a significant legislative movement with over 80 laws either passed or pending enactment across various states. This shows a concerted effort by state governments and institutions to regulate the operation of autonomous vehicles within their jurisdictions. These laws vary in focus and scope but collectively contribute to a broader national effort to ensure autonomous vehicles operate safely and reliably.

While autonomous cars have the potential to transform several sectors significantly, concerns around customer trust and safety remain paramount. The recorded fatalities and significant injuries highlight the need for comprehensive regulation and oversight. The establishment of commissions, the NHTSA’s tiers of autonomous capability, and both federal and state-level legislation represent critical steps toward addressing these challenges, ensuring that the promise of autonomous vehicles can be realized in a manner that prioritizes public safety.

Federal Autonomous Vehicle Law: The Changing Landscapes

The changing landscapes of federal autonomous vehicle law mark a pivotal moment in the governance of autonomous cars in the United States. This legislation underscores a significant development in the regulatory approach toward autonomous vehicles, reflecting a nuanced understanding of the technology’s potential and the complexities involved in its integration into society.

H.R. 3388, the Safely Ensuring Lives Future Deployment and Research In Vehicle Evolution Act, was approved on June 9, 2017, and is a major federal legislation that governs autonomous cars. 

The SELF DRIVE Act represents a comprehensive effort to establish a federal framework for regulating autonomous vehicles. It addresses various aspects of autonomous vehicle technology, from development and testing to deployment and operation, aiming to foster innovation while ensuring safety and reliability. One of the critical features of this act is its facilitation of state-level action. 

Creating the Highly Automated Advisory Council as mandated by the SELF DRIVE Act is a forward-looking measure that recognizes the importance of ongoing dialogue and expertise in guiding the evolution of autonomous vehicle regulations. This council brings together stakeholders from various sectors, including technology, automotive, safety, and consumer protection, to provide insights and recommendations on a range of issues related to autonomous vehicles. Its role is critical in ensuring that policy development keeps pace with technological advancements, addressing emerging challenges, and capitalizing on new opportunities.

The requirement for safety reviews by the Department of Transportation is another cornerstone of the SELF DRIVE Act, emphasizing the paramount importance of safety in the deployment of autonomous vehicles. These reviews are designed to rigorously evaluate the safety of autonomous vehicle technologies before they are allowed on public roads, ensuring that they meet stringent safety standards. This process not only aims to protect the public but also to build confidence in autonomous vehicle technology, which is essential for its successful integration into daily life.

Who To Blame Or Hold Liable for AI Related Car Accidents?

Assigning blame or liability in AI-related car accidents is complex due to AI systems’ unique characteristics. The involvement of various entities in developing and deploying AI—such as software developers, hardware producers, and data trainers—creates a “problem of many hands,” where responsibility is diffused across multiple parties. This can lead to situations where it’s challenging to pinpoint who is at fault, potentially leaving victims without recourse or unfairly placing the burden on those lower in the decision-making chain.

Who To Blame Or Hold Liable for AI Related Car Accidents?

Determining who is accountable is further complicated by the special characteristics of AI systems. 

Addressing this issue requires clear regulations and legal frameworks that delineate responsibilities and ensure fair accountability. Innovations in legal approaches, including new liability models or insurance schemes, may also be necessary to adapt to the evolving landscape of AI in automotive technology, ensuring justice and compensation for affected parties.

Why Consult An Attorney For AI-Related Accidents

Regarding the complexity of AI-related accidents, consulting an attorney with expertise in AI and automotive law is crucial. These professionals possess the specialized knowledge to navigate the evolving legal landscape, identify liable parties, and advise on the best course of action. Their expertise ensures that individuals affected by AI-related accidents can protect their rights and secure fair compensation. Given the intricacies of attributing fault in AI incidents, legal guidance becomes indispensable for navigating claims and litigation in this advanced and changing field.

In Summary

Integrating AI in autonomous vehicles introduces a complex legal landscape marked by evolving regulations and safety concerns. Understanding the five tiers of autonomy is crucial as they directly impact legal frameworks and liability issues. A combination of federal and state laws in the US guides the industry, creating a dynamic regulatory environment. Liability in AI-related accidents is particularly complex, involving multiple parties and necessitating specialized legal expertise. Therefore, seeking legal counsel is vital for navigating these challenges, ensuring compliance, and protecting rights in this rapidly advancing field.

Contact Us at Charbonnet Law

For legal advice and assistance regarding AI-related car accidents, contact Charbonnet Law

Our experienced attorneys are well-versed in AI and automotive law and can help protect your interests in this rapidly changing field.


With over 50 years of legal experience serving families in the New Orleans area and surrounding Louisiana communities, our firm takes pride in providing clients with personalized legal services tailored to individual needs.

  • “I walked in as a client and walked out as a friend. If you are good at what you do, you will never need expensive ads to prove it. Good outshines the rest and in volatile times such as now always go for the good and at Charbonnet Law Firm you will be treated as humans and not just a case file. It’s my word of mouth endorsement and I approve this message.”

    A. Bajaj

  • “It’s easy to get caught up in lies. These days it’s hard to weed out good from bad. The best endorsement is what comes from people, not the lawyers’ own endorsements, paid celebrity endorsements or actors telling you they made millions. Charbonnet law firm has no expensive ads because they have happy clients. I am one of them!”

    J. Kelly

  • “If I had to sum it up in short Charbonnet Law Firm has a team that treats everyone with respect and esteem. Kindness is apparent as soon as you walk into the office, don’t be just a case number! I am not just saying it I am a client too!”

    B. Smith

  • “Best Firm in New Orleans. Great service. These guys treated me like family whenever I got in a tight situation. Clean office and great location in the Metairie area.”

    Q. Lee


Home contact Form