Berlin Hebert was an introverted Vietnam veteran that rode motorcycles and sported multiple tattoos. Richard Deakes was an outgoing bingo enthusiast and regular churchgoer. In spite of their differences, the two roommates at the Southeast Louisiana War Veterans Home in Reserve became close friends. In April 2020, they contracted COVID-19. Sadly, they both became seriously ill and died one day apart.

The families of the men decided to sue the facility for medical malpractice – claiming the veterans home were negligent in preventing the spread of coronavirus. A medical panel ruled the facility breached their standard of care and had committed gross negligence.

Medical malpractice arises when a healthcare provider, which includes doctors, nurses, and technicians, does not provide the level of care that is expected and appropriate for their profession. This failure to meet the standard of care may lead to harm or injury to the patient. Understanding the common examples and the criteria for proving a case is crucial to achieving a successful outcome.

Delayed Diagnosis

When it comes to certain medical conditions, early diagnosis and prompt treatment can mean the difference between a full recovery and a life-altering outcome. In some cases, a healthcare professional’s failure to timely diagnose a serious condition, such as cancer, heart attack, or stroke, can have devastating consequences. Delayed diagnosis can result in the need for more aggressive treatment, decreased chances of survival, or irreversible damage to the patient’s health.

Surgical Errors

Undergoing surgery can be a stressful experience for patients, and they place a great deal of trust in the hands of their surgeons and medical team. Unfortunately, surgical errors can and do occur, leaving patients with lasting physical, emotional, and financial consequences. Examples of surgical errors include wrong-site surgery, incorrect surgical procedures, foreign objects left inside the patient, or damage to surrounding tissues and organs. To establish medical malpractice in these cases, it is crucial to show the surgical team breached the standard of care and this breach directly caused the patient’s injuries or complications.

Anesthesia Errors

Anesthesia plays a critical role in ensuring patient comfort and safety during surgical procedures. However, errors involving anesthesia administration can lead to severe complications, permanent injury, or even death. Common anesthesia errors include incorrect dosage, failure to monitor vital signs, allergic reactions, or improper intubation. The consequences can range from mild discomfort to brain damage, paralysis, or other life-altering conditions.

Medication Mistakes

Medications are an essential tool in the treatment and management of various medical conditions. However, errors in prescribing, dispensing, or administering medication can lead to serious consequences for patients. Common medication mistakes include incorrect dosage, drug interactions, administering the wrong medication, or failing to consider a patient’s allergies. These errors can result in severe side effects, organ damage, or even death.

Childbirth Injuries

The birth of a child is a momentous occasion, but complications during labor and delivery can result in life-changing injuries for both mother and baby. Medical malpractice in childbirth can involve failure to detect fetal distress, improper use of forceps or vacuum extractors, or delay in performing a necessary cesarean section. These errors can lead to conditions such as cerebral palsy, Erb’s palsy, or maternal hemorrhage.

Inadequate Follow-Up Care

Proper follow-up care is essential for patients’ recovery and well-being after medical procedures or treatments. Inadequate monitoring, failure to address complications, or neglecting to provide necessary instructions can significantly impact a patient’s health. Examples of inadequate follow-up care include neglecting to schedule follow-up appointments, not addressing patients’ concerns, or ignoring signs of infection or other complications. When a healthcare provider’s negligence in post-treatment monitoring leads to further harm, it may be considered medical malpractice.

Hospital-Acquired Infections

Patients rely on hospitals to provide a safe and sterile environment for their care, but hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) can pose a significant threat to their well-being. These infections often result from inadequate infection control measures, such as improper sterilization of equipment, insufficient hand hygiene, or contaminated surfaces. HAIs can lead to serious complications, prolonged hospital stays, or even death.

Informed Consent Violations

Informed consent is a fundamental aspect of healthcare, ensuring patients are fully aware of the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a proposed treatment before agreeing to proceed. Healthcare providers have a duty to obtain informed consent before performing any medical procedure or administering treatment. Violations of informed consent can occur when a provider fails to disclose necessary information, misrepresents the risks, or proceeds without the patient’s agreement.

What Do You Need to Prove Medical Malpractice?

Successfully pursuing a medical malpractice claim hinges on establishing four key elements. These are:

  • Duty of care: Demonstrate the healthcare provider had an obligation to adhere to a specific standard of care when treating the patient.
  • Breach of duty: Show the provider deviated from the established standard of care by acting negligently, making errors, or failing to provide adequate treatment.
  • Causation: Establish a direct link between the healthcare provider’s breach of duty and the harm or injury suffered by the patient.
  • Damages: Prove the patient incurred quantifiable losses, such as medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, or diminished quality of life, as a result of the provider’s negligence.

Establishing these elements is crucial for a successful medical malpractice claim.

Statute of Limitations When Pursuing a Malpractice Claim

Medical Malpractice Attorney

The statute of limitations is a crucial factor to consider when filing a medical malpractice claim, as it sets a strict deadline for initiating legal action. In Louisiana, the statute of limitations is one year from the medical provider’s negligent act. If patients are unaware of the malpractice initially, they have one year from the date they became aware or could have reasonably discovered it.

It is important to note the plaintiff is responsible for proving they did not, and could not have reasonably discovered the negligence more than a year before initiating the lawsuit when relying on the discovery rule.

Louisiana law also stipulates all medical malpractice lawsuits must be filed no later than three years from the date of the alleged negligence. This is referred to as a “statute of repose,” which prohibits lawsuits filed more than three years after the malpractice took place, regardless of the severity of the medical error or whether the patient had a reasonable chance to discover the error and resulting damage.

The timeline for Louisiana’s medical malpractice statute of limitations is halted, or “tolled” in legal terms, when a plaintiff requests a review from a medical review panel. This step is mandatory in nearly all medical malpractice cases in the state before proceeding with a lawsuit.

If you have been injured  in a car accident or harmed by the negligence of a medical practitioner, contact or call us at (504) 294-5094 today for a free consultation.


With over 50 years of legal experience serving families in the New Orleans area and surrounding Louisiana communities, our firm takes pride in providing clients with personalized legal services tailored to individual needs.

  • “I walked in as a client and walked out as a friend. If you are good at what you do, you will never need expensive ads to prove it. Good outshines the rest and in volatile times such as now always go for the good and at Charbonnet Law Firm you will be treated as humans and not just a case file. It’s my word of mouth endorsement and I approve this message.”

    A. Bajaj

  • “It’s easy to get caught up in lies. These days it’s hard to weed out good from bad. The best endorsement is what comes from people, not the lawyers’ own endorsements, paid celebrity endorsements or actors telling you they made millions. Charbonnet law firm has no expensive ads because they have happy clients. I am one of them!”

    J. Kelly

  • “If I had to sum it up in short Charbonnet Law Firm has a team that treats everyone with respect and esteem. Kindness is apparent as soon as you walk into the office, don’t be just a case number! I am not just saying it I am a client too!”

    B. Smith

  • “Best Firm in New Orleans. Great service. These guys treated me like family whenever I got in a tight situation. Clean office and great location in the Metairie area.”

    Q. Lee


Home contact Form